At no time can we recall
civil society paying as much attention to the new Information and Communication
Technologies (ICTs) as in the last five years. There are two reasons
for this: first, the rapid development in the technologies themselves
that also brought about the resurgence of the Internet since the New
Communication Order in the 1970s, and second, civil society’s increased
use of ICTs, which has allowed them to organise, network, campaign,
and bring about social actions differently.
For the women’s movement, the new ICTs are also a central issue because
of the benefits and opportunities they present to those in a position
to tap into their potential. However, many women’s organisations are
at the same time also concerned about the impact on women of the widening
gap in terms of access to ICTs (or the lack thereof ).
The gap between the information ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots,’ commonly referred
to as the “digital divide,” has thus become an overarching concern for
civil society, private sector, governments, and intergovernmental organisations
including the United Nations. In the coming World Summit on the Information
Society (WSIS), ensuring women’s access to the new ICTs is a common
agenda for all these social actors. Touted as the first high-level international
gathering of all key stakeholders to develop a better understanding
of the information revolution and its impact on the international community
and on development, the Summit has contributed in opening up more discussion
spaces on gender and the new ICTs.
This issue of Women in Action examines the different questions around
gender and ICTs with the hope of evolving a critical position that can
be presented not only in the WSIS but in many other venues where these
issues are taken up. We have invited experts such as Nancy J. Hafkin
and Sonia Jorge who discuss why it is imperative to consider gender
from the beginning of the design of ICT projects. In their article “Get
In and Get Early: Ensuring Women’s Access to and Participation in ICT
Projects,” Hafkin and Jorge caution that the number of women involved
in project design and implementation, or as participants, is not a guarantee
of gender awareness.
In “Moulding ICT to Their Needs: Kerala’s Women Overcome their Misgivings,”
Prema Nair talks about the paradoxical situation in Kerala, India where
despite the high educational attainment, women remain invisible in technical
spheres including ICTs. Nair tells us that majority of the computer
companies in this Indian state prefer men to women as long-term investment,
especially in the area of product development, because of the misperception
that women are less experimental. There is also the common perception
that women cannot cope with the demands of full time ICT-based work
and that their priorities revolve around their families.
Doe Mayer and Barbara Pillsbury, in their article “Women Connect!” share
with us the experiences from a project that aimed to help women’s NGOs
become more strategic and participatory in their use of communication
by combining the new ICTs with traditional and mass media. The campaign
for the Right to Communicate is highlighted in this issue by Sally Burch,
who posits that this is not just a legal-juridical issue. The threats
to the recognition of this right, she stresses, vary from outright censorship
to monopolistic concentration [of ownership], from the imposition of
a single cultural model to international pressure to deregulate the
industry and privatise the airwaves.
Isis considers the call for women’s involvement in gender and ICT policy
discussions, including the WSIS, as one important way of asserting our
overall social justice and gender concerns. However, we would also like
to stress that it is crucial for the diversity of women’s experiences
to be taken into consideration in the formulation of guiding principles
for the Information Society. One particular issue for women that we
are looking at with critical lenses is how perspectives on women and
ICTs are arrived at. Currently, given the wide spectrum of actors engaged
in discussions of gender and ICT issues, there is a tendency for the
least common denominator among all the issues—that is access to ICTs,
to be put forward as the key concern. Other issues such as democratisation
of the media; globalised information economy—with the U.S. at the forefront
and Southern countries remain at the periphery as suppliers of cheap
labour and raw materials; and the quality and relevance of information
posted on the web or circulated through other forms of ICTs are concerns
important to women in the South but are not put forward as part of a
broader platform for the sake of reaching consensus.
Another concern that needs greater discussion is that ensuring access
does not necessarily mean providing the appropriate tools and guaranteeing
effective use. Neither does it necessarily equate to women’s empowerment
and gender equality. And for women from the global South, the struggle
for gender equality is linked to the broader social justice movements
that are advocating the diversity of views, opinions, content, and information
and respect for indigenous and localised knowledge systems.
The well-known fact that women are not a monolithic nor a uni-dimensional
category holds true in this issue as well. Women’s realities greatly
vary depending on their socio-cultural, political and economic contexts
as well as their geo-political locations, and many other factors. Women’s
access, therefore, is really about creating the conditions necessary
to make accessing information via electronic means a truly useful and
effective tool. In other words, absent the rhetoric and the jargon,
the agenda is that women should be able to evaluate the efficacy of
the new ICTs and make their choices according to their usefulness and
appropriateness. No more, no less.