No. 2, 2002
Get In and Get In
Early: Ensuring Women’s
Access to and Participation in ICT Projects
by Nancy J. Hafkin and
Sonia Jorge
Recent research on Information
and Communication Technology (ICT)-based projects shows that the majority
of these projects developed and funded by major donors do not consider
gender an important component of project design and, consequently, fail
to address the demands of women in the targeted communities and provide
them access to ICT.
No Women at the Start
Much of the transfer of ICT to developing countries has come in the
form of projects funded and/or executed by multilateral, bilateral and
non-governmental organisations and foundations. Regrettably, and following
the pattern of other earlier development interventions, the inclusion
of women and their needs in these projects has generally come as an
afterthought. The year 1995 was a watershed for most of these groups
to start ICT and development efforts. However, it was not until 1998
that the consideration of gender and ICT began to appear on the agenda
of donor and international development organisations.1 This was more
evident in the papers presented to the International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) World Telecommunication Development Conference in Valletta,
Malta and International Development Research Centre’s sponsorship of
the track on women and ICT for the Economic Commission for Africa’s
40th anniversary conference on women and development in Addis Ababa,
Ethiopia. Even after that introduction, it was not until 2002 that many
important development players, such as the World Bank, the United States
Agency for International Development and the European Union, began to
take seriously the integration of gender in ICT projects.
More and more, research
is making the case for gender equality and equity efforts. “New evidence
demonstrates that when women and men are relatively equal, economies
tend to grow faster, the poor move more quickly out of poverty, and
the well-being of men, women and children is enhanced.”2 Development
organisations are coming to realise that gender analysis and incorporation
of gender are necessary if they are to fulfil their mandate and meet
their objectives. Put simply, many development practitioners now believe
that the incorporation of gender concerns results in more successful
project outcomes. 3
Given the new awareness
of the role of gender in ICT policy, what insights can we offer to ensure
that the mistakes of efforts in other areas (i.e., agriculture, transport
and environmental projects) are not repeated in project design and implementation
and that a workable approach is taken from the beginning?
Why Women are Invisible
While there is new consensus on the importance of a gender focus in
information technology and development, the incorporation of gender
into projects linking ICT and development is still the exception, rather
than the rule. One reason for this is that “if you don’t ask for gender,
you don’t get gender.” In many cases, project designers do not incorporate
gender into their analyses and design because project proposal guidelines
do not ask for it. This happens even when the majority of project participants
and potential beneficiaries are women. An example is Peoplink <http://www.peoplink.org>,
a well-known and successful example of artisans, the majority of whom
are women, in developing countries using e-commerce to market their
wares. Yet the Peoplink project proposal to the World Bank Group’s infoDev
made no single mention of women or gender. When there are no references
to gender in the project proposal format instructions, and no requests
for gender-disaggregated data or analysis in the reporting requirements
either, these elements rarely emerge voluntarily. As Helen Derbyshire
wrote, “equity outcomes are not achieved unless they are explicitly
stated and operationalised through well thought-out procedures.”4
The other reason
is simply the lack of gender awareness on the part of those involved
in project planning. This leads to incomplete project analysis (i.e.,
no gender analysis) and consequently, the failure to address women’s
needs and demands. For example, telecentre projects in Chile, Ecuador,
and Peru, which did not consider gender from the start, found that they
did not meet women’s demands and that they were not providing equal
access to women and girls because: (1) they did not address gender relations
and the social constraints imposed on women and girls, and (2) they
did not provide services that addressed women’s needs.5
How to do Gender
What do project planners need to do in order to incorporate gender into
ICT projects? Some suggestions for incorporating gender into project
design and implementation follow:
(1) It is imperative
to consider gender from the beginning of project design. They are not
to be added in hindsight or as a mid-term correction. Key to doing this
is the involvement of gender-aware persons in project planning or design.
Gender-awareness is the desired minimum; someone trained in gender analysis
would be optimal. In addition, by using an engendered project design
process, which serves as a guide on how to integrate gender analysis
in the planning process, the team is most likely to understand and include
gender considerations.6 It should be noted that the number of women
involved in project design and implementation, or as participants, is
not a guarantee of gender awareness, but a fully participatory process
will most likely include gender experts and/or input from organisations
that work with women and on gender issues. There are many cases where
women feature prominently in design and implementation teams, but without
any gender awareness.
(2) It is nearly
impossible to find a project without gender issues. Project designers
in China thought that theirs was such a project.7 The Ministry of Information
Infrastructure in China, executors of the project, believed that macro-policy
projects, particularly those in technical areas, were gender-neutral
and did not need to incorporate any special concern for women. It held
that ICT development in China, particularly in e-commerce, would benefit
many people in China and “...so, automatically, women will be half of
the beneficiaries.” Labouring under such an argument, the agency did
not take any particular note of women’s needs or interests in the project.
In an effort to incorporate gender into its projects, infoDev sponsored
a gender analysis of this and other projects, in the course of which
the reviewer brought Ministry officials to see that the project actually
had many gender aspects that they had not considered.8 In Ecuador, Chasquinet
has implemented numerous successful telecentres; however, the organisation
noticed that even when it assumed that everyone would benefit from services
provided, it was clear that usage patterns reflected gender differences
and that the telecentres needed to address those differences by developing
specific programmes for women and girls.9
The assumption that
a so-called gender-neutral information technology project will benefit
an entire population, regardless of gender, disregards the impact of
gender relations on technology and the societal constraints that women
face in accessing and using information technology.
(3) The socio-cultural
context is all-important. Technology does not operate in a vacuum. In
itself, information technology cannot combat constraining socio-cultural
forces (such as machismo and negative male attitudes toward women and
stereotypes about women), but needs to be complemented by gender analysis
and corrective measures. This is illustrated by another infoDev funded-project
in Panama,10 where the technology itself could not correct extensive
gender discrimination in employment. Although a Web-based database of
graduates seeking employment got the resumes of many women to employers’
desks (or monitors), traditional attitudes of machismo still reigned,
preventing women from being hired for managerial positions. In a third
infoDev funded-project in Peru,11 lack of awareness of gender roles
on the part of project designers meant that the economic roles that
women play and the ways in which they could benefit from the new technology
were overlooked. The project was directed at information services for
farmers, who the project defined as men, ignoring the important economic
roles women play in agriculture in Peru. In an infoDev funded-project
in India that uses personal data assistants to collect information on
women’s health, the lack of gender analysis prevented an understanding
of gender relations on the vital issue of reproductive health.12 Questions
about reproductive behaviour were directed only to women, but men’s
attitudes are obviously essential to a full understanding of reproductive
health. In the China project cited earlier, the absence of gender analysis
led to a blind spot about the different ways that the proposed telecom
reform policy would impact men and women. In a training programme for
East African health professionals held in Kenya, the lack of gender
analysis kept the project from taking proactive measures to recruit
women and anticipating the difficulties women would encounter in terms
of project scheduling and access to connectivity.13
Awareness of the
socio-cultural context is also of overriding importance in ensuring
the participation by, and the distribution of benefits to, both women
and men. In some cases, this could happen best by ensuring that women
and men work together. In other cases, it meant separation of the sexes
in training and meetings. Often, special accommodation is needed to
ensure that women as well as men are able to participate (e.g., attention
to course and meeting schedule in recognition of women’s multiple roles
and time constraints).
(4) In technical
fields (including meetings and training), projects need to be pro-active
to ensure the participation of women as well as men. The pool of eligible
women in technical areas, especially in Africa, is small, and sometimes,
corrective measures may be needed to include them. For instance, in
technical training, because of the smaller number of women who take
technical courses, they may have lower skill levels than men and some
reme-diation may be necessary. In addition, outreach efforts are essential
to ensure that women are aware of project services and opportunities.
These efforts must consider the appropriate channels in communicating
with women (which, for example, may not be an Internet-based or E-mail-based
advertisement but rather a poster in schools or women’s support organisa-tions)
and must try to provide women with the necessary conditions to participate
in project activities (such as day-care assistance or schedules that
consider women’s multiple work responsibilities).
Where We Go from
Here
Based on experience, if we want to address gender issues in ICT projects,
gender must be integrated into project analysis and design from the
beginning. There is no such thing as gender-neutral design. Gender-neutral
projects neglect the complex socio-economic and cultural context which
impacts project outcomes and which constrains women’s access to and
participation in ICT projects.
The integration
of gender analysis in project design and implementation is of great
importance. We recommend two specific strategies. First, on-going research
and work on gender and ICTs should be made widely available to inform
and educate practitioners about gender analysis and to increase awareness
of gender issues. Second, donors must take the responsibility of incorporating
gender concerns in their own work and in the specific requirements for
project preparation and funding, even when projects are demand-driven
(i.e. when donors receive proposals from organisations to fund their
projects). Specifically, donors should develop and publish guidelines
for project design and implementation that integrate gender analysis
and provide guidance on how to implement projects from a gender perspective
(e.g. project proposal instructions and data requirements that include
gender considerations, and gender-disaggregated data for monitoring
and evaluation purposes). In addition, donors should develop accessible
gender resources that can be used by their partners.
Nancy
Hafkin has worked in the area of gender and information technology for
development for more than thirty years. For 25 years she was with the
United Nations Economic Commission for Africa in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
as chief of research and publications at the African Center for Women,
chief of the Pan African Development Information System, leader of the
ECA team to promote information technology in Africa and coordinator
of the African Information Society Initiative. She now lives in Boston,
Massachusetts, USA.
Sonia
Jorge has been involved in the telecommunications reform process for
12 years. Her recent projects include the development of national policies
for the governments of Mozambique and Sri Lanka, the design and implementation
plan of the Telecommunications Development Fund for the Dominican Republic,
the development of a training curriculum on gender perspectives in telecommunications
policy for the International Telecommunications Union, technical assistance
to the Bolivian regulator, and the Telecentre Implementation Plan for
South Africa. Ms. Jorge is a Portuguese citizen who was raised in Angola
and is now based in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. She can be contacted
at E-mail: <sjorge@att.net>.
Footnotes
1 Although the Association for Progressive Communication
Women’s Networking Support Programme (APC-WNSP), which puts emphasis
on using ICTs as advocacy tools, got underway in 1993. See Association
for Progressive Communications, Networking for Change: the APC-WNSP’s
First Eight Years (Manila: 2000) for a detailed account of APC’s work
in this area.
2 The World Bank, Integrating Gender into the World Bank’s Work: A Strategy
for Action (Washington, D.C., 2002).
3 Why do we focus on women while using gender analysis that considers
the situation of both men and women? When talking about gender and development,
we are looking at whether policy, projects and activities impact men
and women differently. From the history of development we know that
the differential impact nearly always favours men. Thus, to achieve
equity, gender analysis leads to special attention to the situation
of women.
4 Helen Derbyshire, Gender Manual: A Practical Guide for Development
Policy Makers and Practitioners. London (UK): Department for International
Development (2002), p.10.
5 See Sonia Jorge, Gender Perspectives on Telecentres, ITU-Telecom Americas
2000; Chasquinet, Estado del Arte de los Telecentros en America Latina
y el Caribe, February 2002 <http://www.tele-centros.org/estarte/index.html>;
and presentations of telecentre projects at the Gender Evaluation Methodology
Workshop, APC-WNSP training workshop for ICT projects in Latin America
and the Caribbean, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 15-19 May 2002.
6 Sonia Jorge, “Gender-Sensitive ICT Projects: A Policy Framework,”
prepared for the Gender Evaluation Methodology Workshop, APC-WNSP training
workshop for ICT projects in Latin America and the Caribbean, Cuernavaca,
Mexico, 15-19 May 2002.
7 “Exploring Adequate Reform Models for the Telecom Sector in China.”
The gender analysis of this project was completed for infoDev by Prof.
Liu Meng in a study to be published shortly on the infoDev Website:
<http://wbln0018.worldbank. org/ict/projects.nsf/20c7f8205b9d19018
5256b180057ba4f/d3f2f6035a6250338 5256b10005b7dfd?OpenDocument>.
8 A number of gender analyses of infoDev projects cited in this article
point out gender omissions in projects that could have been corrected
in project design. The citations from infoDev projects are not meant
to criticise infoDev projects; rather, they commend the institution
for its openness to gender analysis and its application to future projects.
Few other donors have done this. More details on the infoDev gender
review framework can be found in Louise Chamberlain, “Gender Review
of ICT Projects” <http://www/digitalnetwork.org/content/stories/index.cfm?key=250>.
9 Geovanna Muñoz, “The BarrioNet Project,” presented at the Gender
Evaluation Methodology Workshop, APC-WNSP training workshop for ICT
projects in Latin America and the Caribbean, Cuernavaca, Mexico, 15-19
May 2002.
10 “The National Graduate Registry in Panama—Partners for Employment.”
Gender analysis of this project was completed for infoDev by Michael
Clulow in a study to be published shortly on the infoDev Website: <http://wbln0018.
worldbank.org/ict/projects.nsf/20c7f8205b9d190185256b180057ba4f/8a20e479a61c0c1f85256b5d0060948d?
OpenDocument>
11 “Information Systems for Rural Development: A Demonstration Project.”
Gender analysis of this project was done for infoDev by Norma Puican
in a study to be published shortly on the infoDev Website: <http://wbln0018.worldbank.
org/ict/projects.nsf/20c7f8205b9d 190185256b180057ba4f/886bce8 daced1d7d85256b
750070e048?Open Document>.
12 “India Health Care Project—Use of Information Technology for Delivering
Quality Health Care to the Rural Population.” Gender analysis of this
project was completed for infoDev by Prof. Shiraz Wajih in a study to
be published shortly on the infoDev Website: <http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/ict/projects.nsf/e4ed1d55d4e1c27085256b
180057ba50/eeaa76fe47e8a51d85256b 10005b7bf2?OpenDocument>.
13 “Infodev Health Information Training Center.” Gender analysis of
this project was completed by Karen Odhiambo in a study to be published
shortly on the infoDev Website: <http://wbln0018. worldbank.org/ict/projects.nsf/20c7f8205b9d190185256b180057ba4f/84dfebf109f0be0785256b10005b7bf4?
OpenDocument>.
Also
in this Issue:
Get
in and Get in Early:Ensuring women’s access to and participation in
ICT projects
Moulding
ICT to Their Needs:Kerala’s Women Overcome Their Misgivings
Women Connect! Case study of an alternative
communication model
ICT Applications in Latin America: From Information
to Knowledge Building
Internet Cafes: Connectivity for the Masses?
Girls with Digital Diaries: Empowerment Issues
Telecentres for Universal Access: Engendered
Policy Options
Gender Issues in Information Technology Communication
The Right to Communicate: New Challenges for
the Women’s Movement
The World Summit on the Information Society and the
Women's Agenda
we'd
like to hear from you
write to the Editors: communications@isiswomen.org
or the Webteam: webteam@isiswomen.org
Not all the titles in the print form
of Women In Action are available in this site though. For the full print
version, you may subscribe or, if you are also publishing women-focused
reading materials, arrange for an exchange of publications.