No. 2, 2002
Media Section: Spaces of Our Own
by Sharon Bhagwan
Rolls
Daily, we consume
stories of conflict from all over the world. But more and more, it seems
media is selling us nothing else but conflict. International media treat
us to their own perspectives on the tides of internal and external conflicts,
and the social and economic impact of such conflicts, without their
historical context or the benefit of local analysis. Local media, meantime,
focuses on the antics of “honourable” members of parliament, echoing
not only their political rhetoric but also highly racist remarks that
amplify their countries’ social instability. Whatever happened to the
stories of conflict resolution, peace-building initiatives and the promotion
of racial tolerance, goodwill and understanding?
Where are the stories
of peace? Peace is not just about the absence of war. Peace is about
our lives at home and in our communities.
The document “Building
a Women’s Peace Agenda,” which highlights the discussions at the May
1999 Hague Appeal for Peace Conference, points out the innovative peace
and human rights information and communication strategies initiated
by women in conflict situations over the years to provide an ‘additional
viewpoint’ to that of mainstream media. For example, videos were used
to mediate between the African National Congress and Inkatha Freedom
Party in South Africa, while the women of Sri Lanka have used multimedia
and interpersonal communication in finding a solution to the civil war
that has claimed so many lives over nearly two decades.
How can we make sure that the stories of peace, which take into account
the post-conflict development needs of the country, find their way into
our homes, communities, and society? One can not help ask what happened
to the tremendous investments of government agencies and other development
groups promoting media training and supporting media freedom in providing
a balanced perspective, whether on the issue of health, environment,
gender, etc. Such investments should also clarify the link between women’s
peace initiatives and the country’s development. But maybe Conflict
sells and Peace does not.
The realisation
that the time has come for us to rely not only on mainstream media to
tell our stories is the reason for fem’LINKpacific (Media Initiatives
for Women) in Fiji.
Communicating a
Culture of Peace
fem’LINKpacific was founded in September 2000, shortly after the country
was again lurched into another crisis—the illegal overthrow of an elected
government. The coup d’état took place only 13 years after a
similar takeover, twice in 1987. The coups of 1987, however, were led
by a military man, Lieutenant Colonel Sitiveni Rabuka, while that of
May 2000 was by a civilian—a failed businessman, George Speight, who
held Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry and 17 other hostages in the parliament
complex for 56 days. Among the demands of Speight and his followers
was that Fiji’s constitution be replaced so that Indo-Fijians (descendants
of indentured labourers taken to Fiji from India in the colonial period)
would be excluded from the government. The takeover triggered rioting
and looting in the streets of the capital, Suva, which distracted the
police and highlighted that all was not well. As the hostage crisis
progressed, the violence spread to rural settlements outside Suva, and
we became aware of the fear being injected into our communities, especially
in light of the persecution and subsequent displacement of farmers from
Dawasamu and Mauniweni.
Women were instrumental
in maintaining a degree of calm and infusing hope to the people during
those tense weeks. The National Council of Women-Fiji issued our first
media statement denouncing the coup the next day, Saturday May 20th
and then mobilised the network of women’s groups in Suva to gather for
a Peace and Prayer Vigil the following day. From Sunday May 21st, a
multiethnic group of women held a daily vigil throughout the 56-day
hostage crisis. True, we were not without our own tensions and fears,
though this was insignificant compared with the strength generated by
the women’s coming together daily. The Mothers in White who gathered
to pray for the hostages and the women who wrote letters of support
multiplied hope upon hope.
Coordinating the
peace vigil put me in touch with media organisations, local and international.
I was not surprised that while the local dailies carried our media releases,
it was the international media that was drawn to look behind the scenes
of the peace vigil. In doing so, they found a window to women-in-community
perspective of the crisis. On the other hand, many of the local media
practitioners saw in the vigil access to the hostages who, as they were
released, joined the women in solidarity. It became clear that there
was a need for women’s own community-media initiatives that would tell
our stories.
The Agenda in the
Aftermath
fem’LINKpacific came to be out of a desire to provide not just an alternative
viewpoint, but an additional viewpoint, to the coverage of issues by
the mainstream media. It should be added that fem’LINKpacific is concerned
not only with news coverage but also with radio and television programme
productions and broadcasts, promotional campaigns and advertising/marketing.
Since it was established, fem’LINKpacific has documented and produced
a range of community-based productions to share its perspective and
that of partner non-government organisations (NGOs) and civil society
organisations (CSOs).
The idea of a fem’LINKpacific
was inspired by the call to action to NGOs of the strategic objectives
found in Section J of the Beijing Platform for Action: (1) to increase
the participation and access of women to expression and decision making
in and through the media and new technologies; and (2) to promote a
balanced and non-stereotyped portrayal of women in the media. It was
also inspired by UN Security Council Resolution 1325, where global leaders
acknowledged the urgency of bringing women into peace building, and
conflict prevention and resolution. The resolution advocates that women
be assigned places at the peace-negotiating table and as key negotiators
in all levels of conflict resolution.
While lobbying the media industry to develop people-centred and gender-mainstream
policies for increased accountability to their audience, we at fem’LINKpacific
believe we should continue to pursue our own initiatives, which enables
us to be engaged with community women’s groups, in particular, to ‘get
their take’ on the issues and have their stories heard, rather than
relying on mainstream media for the projection of our position on the
various issues.
Since last year,
fem’LINKpacific has engaged partner CSOs and NGOs in “best utilising
the media,” including assisting Fiji Media Watch in May 2001 in their
“Steering Fiji Back to Democracy” workshops in Suva and Lautoka. These
workshops assembled journalists, journalism students and NGOs/CSOs in
a weeklong consultation on the issue of covering a General Election,
in particular the first General Election that followed the May 2000
crisis. The workshops served as an opportunity for dialogue between
the various participants (and for many journalists, an opportunity to
speak out their feelings on covering the crisis), while articulating
the perspectives of NGOs/CSOs on the country’s political situation.
However, some media executives paid no mind to the activity while others
even questioned whether it was the media’s role to advocate and promote
peace and democracy ! (Workshop reports are available from Fiji Media
Watch. Please contact Father Larry Hannan at E-mail: <fmwatch@is.com.fj>.)
As Secretary of
the National Council of Women Fiji, I have also been involved in organising
and facilitating fem’LINKpacific’s Media Mainstreaming Initiative, which
included two training programmes for women NGO leaders, the youth and
government stakeholders, gave an overview of the opportunities available
for communicating issues and stories—whether in the form of a television
magazine segment or a radio campaign. Such investments in training gender
and peace advocates are imperative.
The pressing agenda
includes:
* to understand the status of the media industry today;
* to understand the policies governing decision-making as part of the
origins of the various outputs of the media industry today;
* to facilitate dialogues with media practitioners “to break down” present-day
barriers;
* to create an enabling media environment;
* to formulate a platform that lays the foundation of working together
for fair and balanced coverage of issues while recognising the commercial
objectives of the media industry; and
* to work collectively for the protection of human rights, including
a free and fair media, and the access to information.
Collective effort
is critical in light of the implications of forthcoming debates in parliament
on two important bills, the Media Bill and the Freedom of Information
Bill.
“The Media Bill
historically follows on to other pieces of legislation, but the first
focus of the Bill is to establish an independent body to oversee the
quality of the print and broadcast media,” Information Minister Josefa
Vosanibola said to the Daily Post in July.
If the Media Bill
is enacted, what happens to the current Fiji Media Council, which was
an initiative of the media organisations themselves? How will the legislation
affect our rights as users and consumers of media? Will the media industry
forge alliances with civil society groups to strengthen the call for
a free and fair media?
Community Media
Initiatives
fem’LINKpacific has turned out several interviews and productions toward
strengthening our community media, including our community video series
“fem’TALK.”
While developing,
producing and distributing our community videos, we are also able to
establish linkages with the community and persuade the women to share
their stories on our four issues:
* the role of women in peace and security;
* youth concerns;
* poverty from a social justice perspective, especially in the context
of Fiji’s post-conflict stage; and
* community-based understanding of the principles of human rights, good
governance and democracy.
Thus, the productions
are able to feature not only the “gender experts” but also women from
the urban and rural communities (including village settlements).
In undertaking its
own media initiatives, fem’LINKpacific seeks to:
* assist women in understanding their social, political and civil rights
and how the principles of human rights impact on their daily lives;
* provide women’s groups around Fiji with an advocacy and awareness
tool in devising appropriate strategies in addressing their concerns
and problems;
* share women’s concerns with government and civil society for a better
appreciation of the women’s movement and the women’s peace movement;
and
* contribute to the process of reconciliation as women share their stories
and experiences in an effort to overcome the barriers that lead to racial
intolerance.
So far, the community
videos are distributed to more than 50 women’s groups and civil society
organisations.
fem’LINKpacific
also circulates video kits to the local mainstream media to suggest
to them women-centred “leads” they could expand on. We are also expanding
the fem’TALK viewing guide that accompanies each video release with
the hope that this evolves into a community-based magazine.
Last October 2001,
UNIFEM Pacific convened a round-table meeting on the topic “Women, Peace
and Security” in Melanesia. The participants were challenged to deconstruct
the myth that when men speak on an issue, it is more readily accepted,
and to answer the questions: (1) What does the myth mean for us as women?
and (2) What does it say about our status in society?
The meeting galvanised
the logic of women’s participation in peace negotiations and in influencing
the peace process. As the most ardent advocates for peace, we need to
challenge the patriarchal and inhibiting factors of the mainstream media
that do not provide us with the airtime, space or access to technology
to tell our stories. We must claim our own voices so that the message
we convey is accepted and valued. Whether this requires continued engagement
with the media industry or the development of our own media, we must
have our stories heard.
Sharon
Bhagwan Rolls is a founding member and current Coordinator (producer
and director) of fem’LINKpacific: Media Initiatives for Women. Her work
with the media industry began in 1986, the same year she became involved
in women’s issues as a volunteer of the Young Women’s Christian Association.
She was re-elected to the position of Secretary of the National Council
of Women-Fiji in April this year.
Also
in this Issue:
Get
in and Get in Early:Ensuring women’s access to and participation in
ICT projects
Moulding
ICT to Their Needs:Kerala’s Women Overcome Their Misgivings
Women Connect! Case study of an alternative
communication model
ICT Applications in Latin America: From Information
to Knowledge Building
Internet Cafes: Connectivity for the Masses?
Girls with Digital Diaries: Empowerment Issues
Telecentres for Universal Access: Engendered
Policy Options
Gender Issues in Information Technology Communication
The Right to Communicate: New Challenges for
the Women’s Movement
The World Summit on the Information Society and the
Women's Agenda
we'd
like to hear from you
write to the Editors: communications@isiswomen.org
or the Webteam: webteam@isiswomen.org
Not all the titles in the print form
of Women In Action are available in this site though. For the full print
version, you may subscribe or, if you are also publishing women-focused
reading materials, arrange for an exchange of publications.